AP
- In 1969, the US Army Corps of Engineers dumped 27,000 tons of rock to dam the Niagara River and stop the American Falls.
- They were assessing a growing pile of boulders at the bottom out of concern the falls could become rapids.
- But in the end, engineers found the boulders were necessary to prop up the face of the falls.
"They tamed it and now they will unleash it."
According to The New York Times in 1969, that was how a tourist characterized the historic moment that the Niagara River was released to gush down over the American Falls once again after it had been cut off for six months.
Engineers had blocked it off so they could examine the boulders at the base of the falls and see whether they could be removed.
While it was blocked off, they discovered two bodies as well as countless coins. They also found it wasn't feasible to move all of the rock.
Here's why, after 12,000 years, the famous falls were "turned off."
The Print Collector/Print Collector/Getty Images
Sources: Smithsonian Magazine, New York Times
Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone/Getty Images
Source: Smithsonian Magazine
Sepia Times/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Source: Smithsonian Magazine
The Print Collector/Print Collector/Getty Images
Source: Smithsonian Magazine
Underwood Archives/Getty Images
Source: Smithsonian Magazine
AP
Source: CBC
Patrick Gorski/NurPhoto/Getty Images
All that remained was a cliff — and not a particularly spectacular cliff.
One tourist, who had come from San Francisco to see it, complained, "I thought they were going to turn it off completely."
Sources: New York Times, Smithsonian Magazine, New York Times
AP
Sources: Smithsonian Magazine, CBC, Slate
AP
Source: New York Times
AP
The Corps of Engineers was tasked with working out how the falls could be saved from erosion.
Source: Smithsonian Magazine
Power Authority of the State of New York/AP
One was a man who had been seen leaping off into the falls the previous day and another was a woman who had recently gone missing.
They also discovered plenty of coins people had thrown into the falls over the years.
Source: New York Times
Bob Olsen/Toronto Star via Getty Images
Tourists asked two questions: "Why did they turn it off?" and "How long will it be off?"
But after early hopes that tourism wouldn't be impacted, it soon became clear that when people came to look at the bare cliff, they only stayed for a short stint.
Source: New York Times
AP
The American Falls International Board, which wrote the report, stated it was against their removal.
"It seems quite wrong to make the falls static and unnatural, like an artificial waterfall in a garden or a park, however grand the scale," according to the report.
But it hadn't been a waste of time.
While the American Falls was stopped, engineers bolted and anchored the rocks to make the area as stable as possible.
Sources: Slate, New York Times
BF/AP
Source: New York Times
AP
Not that everyone was impressed. One bystander told The Times: "Big deal, so it starts flowing again."
Another person said, "Isn't that something? They tamed it and now they unleash it."
Another man was even less patient about the work. He said the project was "damn-fool shenanigans — if God wants the falls to become a rapids that's the way it should be."
Source: New York Times
Roberto Machado Noa/LightRocket/Getty Images
In around 15,000 years, the falls are expected to simply disappear.
Sources: Smithsonian Magazine, International Joint Commission
DeWitt Historical Society/Morton Collection/Getty Images
Sources: Slate, Smithsonian Magazine
Correction: April 10, 2023 — An earlier version of this story included a photo caption that was incorrectly dated. It was not taken in 1753; the date has been removed.