When you buy through our links, Insider may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Knowledge is power, the saying goes, so you may be tempted to use wearables to track your health data in the hopes of preventing or managing an illness or hitting certain fitness goals.
You'd be joining the millions of others seduced by the idea that more data will mean better health, as the global fitness tracking industry is estimated to be worth over $74 billion in 2024, up from $46 billion in 2020, according to Statista.
Personalized data — collected using devices such as the best smartwatches or rings — can help people understand how their body reacts to different factors from drinking alcohol or a new diet to smoking, Livvy Probert, a personal trainer, sports scientist, and head of science at personal health assessment company Hawq Score, told Business Insider.
But it can be hard to know which of the seemingly endless array of devices is worth spending money on.
Plus, it's important to take the data, which might not be entirely accurate, with a pinch of salt, Probert said. That doesn't mean the best fitness trackers aren't helpful, it just means you shouldn't take their data as gospel.
The root of the problem lies in the fact it's hard to track individuals with the same tech when we are all different.
And while many brands conduct their own studies, Probert said there's a lack of large-scale, independent research on the accuracy of wearable fitness trackers, further complicated by the fact that the technology is developing all the time.
One small 2017 study of 60 people by Stanford University suggested that most fitness trackers are inaccurate, overestimating calorie burn by up to 93%, while a 2018 meta-analysis of 60 studies found they struggle in particular with less intense forms of movement. Fitness trackers can't know our metabolic rates and how much muscle we have compared to body fat, which affects our energy expenditure.
With that in mind, Probert said to think about what's most important to you (step count, GPS tracking, or sleep metrics, for example) and to choose a wearable that can best help you measure that data and spot trends over time, without comparing yourself to others.
"It is more about looking at the trends than the individual data points," she said. And, Probert cautioned, it's important not to stop listening to your body and checking in with how you feel when using such devices. Don't blindly follow the guidance of your wearable, and make sure checking your data doesn't become an unhealthy obsession, she said.